Showing posts with label BPL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BPL. Show all posts

Monday, April 15, 2013

“There is a clear need for consolidation”

B&E: Indian telecommunications industry may start consolidating by the middle of 2012 after the much-awaited National Telecom Policy, 2011, is unveiled in January 2012. How will this help the industry going forward?

Ranjan Mathews (RM):
There are currently 12 operators or more in most of the 22 circles in the country. This has led to a situation of hyper-competition, fierce pricing battles, plunging profit margins, spectrum scarcity and oversupply. In fact, this situation has arisen as a result of the induction of five new operators in 2008 (the context of much of the 2G Scam) by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT). Further, between 2001 and 2007, there were many mergers and acquisitions (M&As) as older operators either exited the business or acquired other operators to cobble together a pan-India footprint. Significant of these were Bharti, Idea, Vodafone and TATA. Major operators who exited the business were BPL, Max Hutchinson, AT&T, Telstra, etc. Most experts now agree the market is ripe for another round of M&As to prune the market to a more sustainable six operators. This conforms to what is seen in most other international markets where there are no more than 3-5 operators. This is seen as more than sufficient to provide adequate competition in the market place. Thus, the benefits that will accrue as a result of such consolidation are many. One, we will have a healthier industry with adequate financial resources to invest in the technology advances (advanced networks, applications, etc) which are needed to keep the Indian mobile communications industry at the forefront of global advances. Second, one can expect affordable services for the customers. Expanded employment opportunities, reduction in the digital divide, increased rural penetration, more efficient use of scare spectrum, increased availability of loans and equity funding for needed roll-out of telecommunications infrastructure are some of the other benefits that one can expect from consolidation. Further, it will have a positive cascading effect on GDP as it has been established that a 10% rise in broadband penetration leads to a 1.3% increase in GDP.

B&E: But don’t you think it’s too late, in terms of safeguarding the industry?

RM:
The initial flaw was that DoT ignored TRAI’s recommendation to not issue licenses in 2008 without ensuring there was adequate spectrum available. Further, due to the ensuing litigation surrounding the grant of licences, M&A activity could not proceed until the court cases are resolved. Once this happens, the new M&A recommendations made by TRAI will certainly help in facilitating M&A activity. However, another significant factor that will impact M&A activity will be the availability of additional spectrum, spectrum pricing and licence renewal terms for older operators that will see their licences coming up for renewal commencing 2014.

B&E: New players like Loop Telecom, which have invested thousands of crores in buying the spectrum licences, are now requesting the government for an exit. What, according to you, went wrong?

RM:
The fundamental problem was that there were too many players in each licensed area. Contrary to all international norms, the number of operators went to 12. This caused a brutal price war as the new operators fought for market share. However, this only caused a downward spiral for all operators causing a serious decline in profitability. The scarcity of spectrum for the new operators led to many regulatory complaints and litigation. Finally, the eruption of the 2G Scam caused both international and domestic funding to freeze. This caused a liquidity crisis for the new operators who could not raise the required funds for network roll out and market expansion. The litigation also put the license of many of the new operators at risk which further exacerbated their business viability.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Thursday, January 10, 2013

The third time in india

LG finally had it right the third time in india. now it is decisively upping the stakes

“Our determination for walking the full distance is unwavering. We would like to move faster but we won’t be impatient. A broad consensus in favour of industrialisation (in India) is gradually emerging and we trust that the respective Governments are doing their best...”

Yes, this is a comment from a Korean company on its commitment towards India. But while you may be tempted to think this is LG, it is actually a comment from Posco, when we asked them how, despite the problems with the steel plant, the company continues to stubbornly invest time and money in its India plans. While making steel and making consumer durables are like chalk and cheese, Posco’s determination may be due in part, to the inspiring forays of other Korean MNCs in India; LG in particular.

LG had earlier tested the waters with two unsuccessful attempts (in the form of JVs with Bestavision and Birla group). In March 1997, K. R. Kim (who was then working in Panama) was bought on board to spearhead the Indian subsidiary of the Korean consumer durable giant. Moreover, the market, which was led by the likes of BPL, Onida, Videocon, Weston, Philips, et al, was now changing. LG, along with the other Korean giant Samsung, proved more than a handful for the incumbents, with their aggressive pricing, promotion and distribution strategies.

Cut to 2009, the company has not only clocked a mind boggling turnover of Rs.107.93 billion in 2008 (with a growth rate of 18%) but is also aiming high for its next big fix – the $6-billion revenue target by 2010. But the initial experience of LG in India has not been a cakewalk as the key challenge for the company at the time was not of growth but of survival. From cultural conundrums to corruption, from office space hiccups to high attrition rates, the company had it all. In fact, there was a time when the durable giant had to bear the wrath of the local land mafia and criminal elements at its manufacturing base at Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.